Jade was briefed by Davina's PR

Did you know Jade was briefed about what to expect tonight on Big Brother? Or that her PR is the same as Davina's Russell Brand's and Dermot O'Leary's? That might explain why blogs are saying that her exit tonight was closely managed... not just to help save her career, but to keep her from harm.

This post titled 'Big Brother is a con' tells us more about how Jade actually shares the same PR rep as all the Big Brother presenters. It makes a strong case for a show desparate to protect one of its contestants:

 

You have to ask a few questions here, the first one being who manages Jade Goody, Russell Brand, Davina McCall and Dermot O’Leary?
That’s right it’s the same person, a John Noel

 

Address: 10a Belmont Street, London, NW1 8HH
Tel: 020 7428 8400
Fax: 020 7428 8401
Email: john@john-noel.demon.co.uk

 

Now John Doesn’t have Russell Brand showing on his website yet but wikipedia links them together.

 

The next question is why do both Dermot O’Leary and Russell Brand shy away from making any judgement calls on the programmes they present, and at times moving discussion away from the outright calls of racism? And why did Craig Phillips shy away from that charge when he was interviewed? That’s right Craig Phillips is managed by John Noel as well.

 

The next question is why Big Brother gave Jade Goody a big hint about what might have been seen as racist language?

 

The next question is when did they give that hint, when did Jade make that apology to Shilpa Shetty, and when did Shilpa make that “statement”  that there has been no racism?

 

Next question, why has Big Brother ditched the idea of having people waiting outside for the person who is being evicted? This has never happened before, even when there have been charges of bullying in the past. Nasty Nick from the first series had to go through it…

Comments

[Sherrilynne Starkie]

Big Brother was originally designed as a show that would reflect culture and humanity of normal every day folks by putting them into a unreal environment. The British public lapped it up and Channel 4 banked on it. So the show has done was it designed to do...reflect British culture. And the audience doesn't like what it sees in the mirror. Should the show change, or should the audience?