About this blog

  • My day job - I am founder of Battenhall, communications agency for the social media economy.

Contact

In the media

Subscribe to this blog


  • Subscribe to this site by email or RSS

    This is my personal blog and does not reflect the views of my company or clients.

Blog powered by Typepad

Traffic




Disclaimer

  • This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer.

« Second Life becoming the biggest web brand | Main | Google confirms its purchase of YouTube for $1.65bn »

October 09, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cb1de53ef00d834bac4fd53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blogusiasm or blogorrhoea?:

Comments

Personally, I don't mind long posts if they're interesting. But short is better, obviously, considering the average netizen's attention span (or lack thereof). Then again, short is also a perfect excuse for not having to come up with some original content.

Trouble is, if you want to be concise AND get your point across, you really have to understand the finer nuances of the language you're using - which is difficult for non-native speakers like myself. That's why I usually end up taking the long way around. Sorry for that, but you'll just have to put up with it, I fear :-)

Short. I haven't got the time or the attention span to read longer articles at my PC.

The comments to this entry are closed.